Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206171›Full record

ArticlemBio2018

Ecophylogenetics Clarifies the Evolutionary Association between Mammals and Their Gut Microbiota.

Christopher A Gaulke, Holly K Arnold, Ian R Humphreys, Steven W Kembel, James P O'Dwyer, Thomas J Sharpton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Composition and evolutionary characterization of the gut microbiota in pigs.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Environmental fluctuations explain the universal decay of species-abundance correlations with phylogenetic distance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher A GaulkeDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Holly K ArnoldDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Ian R HumphreysDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Steven W KembelDépartment des sciences biologiques, Université du Québec a Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
James P O'DwyerDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Thomas J SharptonDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA thomas.sharpton@oregonstate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our knowledge of how the gut microbiome relates to mammalian evolution benefits from the identification of gut microbial taxa that are unexpectedly prevalent or unexpectedly conserved across mammals. Such taxa enable experimental determination of the traits needed for such microbes to succeed as gut generalists, as well as those traits that impact mammalian fitness. However, the punctuated resolution of microbial taxonomy may limit our ability to detect conserved gut microbes, especially in cases in which broadly related microbial lineages possess shared traits that drive their apparent ubiquity across mammals. To advance the discovery of conserved mammalian gut microbes, we developed a novel ecophylogenetic approach to taxonomy that groups microbes into taxonomic units based on their shared ancestry and their common distribution across mammals. Applying this approach to previously generated gut microbiome data uncovered monophyletic clades of gut bacteria that are conserved across mammals. It also resolved microbial clades exclusive to and conserved among particular mammalian lineages. Conserved clades often manifest phylogenetic patterns, such as cophylogeny with their host, that indicate that they are subject to selective processes, such as host filtering. Moreover, this analysis identified variation in the rate at which mammals acquire or lose conserved microbial clades and resolved a human-accelerated loss of conserved clades. Collectively, the data from this study reveal mammalian gut microbiota that possess traits linked to mammalian phylogeny, point to the existence of a core set of microbes that comprise the mammalian gut microbiome, and clarify potential evolutionary or ecologic mechanisms driving the gut microbiome's diversification throughout mammalian evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGastrointestinal MicrobiomePhylogenyAlgorithmsAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityComputational BiologyHost Microbial InteractionsMammalsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SbioinformaticsecologyevolutionGut microbiomephylogenytaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID30206171
PMCPMC6134092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.