Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206082›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2018

Comparative effectiveness of first-line biological monotherapy use in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis of the RECord-linkage On Rheumatic Diseases study on health care administrative databases.

Ettore Silvagni, Alessandra Bortoluzzi, Greta Carrara, Anna Zanetti, Marcello Govoni, Carlo Alberto Scirè

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ettore SilvagniDepartment of Medical Sciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Ferrara, Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Alessandra BortoluzziDepartment of Medical Sciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Ferrara, Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Greta CarraraEpidemiology Unit, Italian Society for Rheumatology (SIR), Milan, Italy.
Anna ZanettiEpidemiology Unit, Italian Society for Rheumatology (SIR), Milan, Italy.
Marcello GovoniDepartment of Medical Sciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Ferrara, Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Carlo Alberto ScirèDepartment of Medical Sciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Ferrara, Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
University of Ferrara · ITSocietà Italiana di Reumatologia · ITMRC Epidemiology Unit · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThese analyses aim to comparatively evaluate the persistence on treatment of different biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) when administered in monotherapy compared with combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving first-line biologics.

designThis is a retrospective observational study on Administrative Healthcare Databases.

methodsData were extracted from healthcare databases of the Lombardy Region, Italy (2004-2013), as a part of the RECord-linkage On Rheumatic Diseases study, on behalf of the Italian Society for Rheumatology. Analyses included patients with RA starting first-line approved course of bDMARDs and evaluated drug survival by using Cox proportional hazard models. Results are presented as HRs and 95% CI, crude and adjusted for prespecified confounders (age, sex, disease duration, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), previous infections, use of concomitant glucocorticoids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)).

results4478 patients with RA were included (17.84% monotherapy). Etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab were the most prescribed first-line biologics. bDMARD monotherapy was associated with longer disease duration, higher CCI, lower glucocorticoids and NSAIDs use. Compared with monotherapy, combination associated with a lower risk of failure (adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.88). Among monotherapies, considering etanercept as reference, adalimumab (1.28, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.59) and infliximab (2.41, 95% CI 1.85 to 3.15) had higher risk of failure. Concomitant methotrexate (0.78, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.87), leflunomide (0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.98) or csDMARD combinations (0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87) reduced the risk of bDMARD withdrawal.

conclusionAdalimumab and infliximab monotherapies show lower retention rate compared with etanercept. The relatively small number of therapeutic courses different from tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors makes more difficult to achieve conclusive results with other biologics. Concomitant methotrexate, leflunomide and csDMARDs combination associate with longer survival on bDMARD. Our data confirm the effectiveness of the current practices in the choice of etanercept as first-line anti-TNF monotherapy and strengthen the currently recommended use of bDMARDs in combination with csDMARDs.

Indexed as

AbataceptAdalimumabAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsCertolizumab PegolComorbidityComparative Effectiveness ResearchDrug Therapy, CombinationEtanerceptFemaleAbataceptAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsCertolizumab PegolEtanerceptGlucocorticoidsgolimumabInfliximabLeflunomideMethotrexatetocilizumabbiologicsconventional synthetic dmardsdrug persistencerheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID30206082
PMCPMC6144331
OpenAlexW2891139352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.