Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206006›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2019

Health risk perceptions and reasons for use of tobacco products among clients in addictions treatment.

Barbara K Campbell, Thao Le, Noah R Gubner, Joseph Guydish

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What Is (Un)Flavored? A Scoping Review of the Conceptualization of Flavored Cigarillos.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara K CampbellOHSU/PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA. Electronic address: drbarbaracampbell@earthlink.net.
Thao LePhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, 3333 California St., Ste. 265, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. Electronic address: Thao.Le@ucsf.edu.
Noah R GubnerPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, 3333 California St., Ste. 265, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. Electronic address: Noah.Gubner@ucsf.edu.
Joseph GuydishPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, 3333 California St., Ste. 265, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. Electronic address: Joseph.Guydish@ucsf.edu.
Lee University · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (TMS for CUD) UG1DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Keith N. Humphreys, Philip Todd Korthuis · 2015 to 2026
$24.6M
Marketing, FDA communication, tobacco perceptions and use in addiction treatmentR01DA036066 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUYDISH, JOSEPH R · 2013 to 2016
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036066NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA015815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe examined rates of use, health risk perceptions and reasons for use of combustible and non-combustible tobacco products among clients enrolled in addictions treatment across the United States.

methodsParticipants (N = 1153) completed tobacco use surveys and rated health risk perception of all products. Users of non-cigarette products reported their main reason for use of each product. Logistic regression analyses examined associations between health risk perceptions and product use, including combustible cigarette use, and between reasons for use and non-cigarette product use.

resultsCigarette smoking was reported by 77.5%, followed by use of e-cigarettes (26.6%), little filtered cigars (LFCs)/cigarillos (15.4%), smokeless tobacco (11.4%), and cigars (8.4%). Lower perceived health risk of cigarettes was associated with smoking cigarettes (OR = 0.985, 95% CI: 0.975-0.995, p = 0.005). Lower perceived health risk of e-cigarettes was associated with e-cigarette use (OR = 0.991, 95% CI: 0.984-0.998, p = 0.023). Users of cigars and users of LFC/cigarillos (versus other product use) were more likely to report their main reason for use as "enjoying flavor/ taste", and smokeless tobacco users were more likely to report "at times when can't smoke" as their main reason for use compared with other reasons. E-cigarette users were more likely to report to "reduce/quit cigarettes" as their main reason for use as compared to all other reasons except "reduce health risk".

conclusionTreating smoking in addictions treatment should assess all tobacco product use, accuracy of health risk perceptions, and use of e-cigarettes to reduce/quit smoking, in order to promote cessation of combustible tobacco.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultAttitude to HealthCigarette SmokingFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionRiskRisk Reduction BehaviorSmoking CessationSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesVapingAddictions treatmentHealth risk perceptionSmokingTobacco products

Identifiers

PMID30206006
PMCPMC6474775
OpenAlexW2889876785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.