Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30205908›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2019

Family functioning moderates the impact of psychosis-risk symptoms on social and role functioning.

Elizabeth Thompson, Pamela Rakhshan, Steven C Pitts, Caroline Demro, Zachary B Millman, Kristin Bussell, Jordan DeVylder, Emily Kline, Gloria M Reeves, Jason Schiffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elizabeth ThompsonHuman Services Psychology Department, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, United States of America. Electronic address: ethomps1@umbc.edu.
Pamela RakhshanHuman Services Psychology Department, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, United States of America.
Steven C PittsHuman Services Psychology Department, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, United States of America.
Caroline DemroHuman Services Psychology Department, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, United States of America.
Zachary B MillmanHuman Services Psychology Department, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, United States of America.
Kristin BussellDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, 700 West Pratt St., Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.
Jordan DeVylderGraduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, 113 W 60th St, New York, NY 10023, United States of America.
Emily KlineHuman Services Psychology Department, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, United States of America.
Gloria M ReevesDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, 700 West Pratt St., Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.
Jason SchiffmanHuman Services Psychology Department, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, United States of America.

Funding

Administrative Supplement - 3/3: Community Psychology Risk Screening: An Instrument Development StudyR01MH112612 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI PITTS, STEVEN C, SCHIFFMAN, JASON E · 2017 to 2022
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYouth at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis often experience difficulties in social and role functioning. Given evidence that family stress and support can impact psychosis-risk symptoms, as well as an individual's ability to fulfill social and role functions, family dynamics are hypothesized to moderate the effect of psychosis-risk symptoms on functioning.

methodsParticipants at CHR (N = 52) completed the clinician-administered Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Family Assessment Device (FAD) General Functioning Scale, a self-report measure of family functioning including cohesion and support. Interviewers rated participants' current social and role functioning using the Global Functioning: Social and Role Scales.

resultsRegression results indicated that positive symptoms, but not ratings of family functioning, statistically predicted social and role functioning. Perceived family functioning, however, moderated the effect of symptoms on social/role functioning. For individuals who perceived lower levels of family functioning, symptoms were moderately associated with social and role functioning (f

conclusionsFindings support the notion that family functioning may be a clinically meaningful factor for individuals at CHR. Although this cross-sectional data limits our discussion of potential mechanisms underlying the pattern of findings, results suggest that familial support may be beneficial for individuals at risk for psychosis.

Indexed as

FamilyRoleSocial BehaviorSocial SupportAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychotic DisordersRiskYoung AdultAttenuated psychosisClinical high riskFamily supportFunctioning

Identifiers

PMID30205908
PMCPMC6489462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.