Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30205800›Full record

ReviewCurrent pediatric reviews2018

The Therapeutic Potential of Stem Cells for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: "It's About Time" or "Not so Fast" ?

Mong Tieng Ee, Bernard Thébaud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pediatric reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Recent research on the mechanism of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. New Pharmacologic Approaches to Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  11. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: An Update on Experimental Therapeutics.European Medical Journal (Chelmsford, England) · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mong Tieng EeDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) and CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Bernard ThébaudDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) and CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhile the survival of extremely premature infants has improved over the past decades, the rate of complications - especially for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) - remains unacceptably high. Over the past 50 years, no safe therapy has had a substantial impact on the incidence and severity of BPD.

methodsThis may stem from the multifactorial disease pathogenesis and the increasing lung immaturity. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) display pleiotropic effects and show promising results in neonatal rodents in preventing or rescuing lung injury without adverse effects. Early phase clinical trials are now underway to determine the safety and efficacy of this therapy in extremely premature infants. RESULTS AND

conclusionThis review summarizes our current knowledge about MSCs, their mechanism of action and the results of preclinical studies that provide the rationale for early phase clinical trials and discuss remaining gaps in our knowledge.

Indexed as

AnimalsBronchopulmonary DysplasiaHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationangiogenesisbronchopulmonarydysplasiaMSCsstem cells.Therapeutic potential

Identifiers

PMID30205800
PMCPMC6416190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.