ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2019
The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for recurrent aneurysms: Clinical and imaging results.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retreatment rate and strategies for recurrent and residual aneurysms after Woven EndoBridge (WEB) treatment: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- The RISE trial: A Randomized Trial on Intra-Saccular Endobridge devices.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020Trial
- Higher risk of recurrence in partially thrombosed cerebral aneurysms post-WEB (Woven EndoBridge) device treatment: insights from the WorldWideWEB Consortium registry.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of a novel flow-disruptor device in a rabbit aneurysm model: a preliminary study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identifying risk factors for perioperative thromboembolic complications in patients treated with the Woven EndoBridge device.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023Article
- Contour-Assisted coiling with jailed microcatheter May result in better occlusion (CoCoJaMBO) in wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: Proof of principle and immediate angiographic results.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023Article
- Endovascular Management of Hemorrhagic Stroke.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Review
- The Woven EndoBridge Finally Coming Home across the Atlantic: What to Expect?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a novel intrasaccular flow disrupter designed for wide-necked aneurysms. We present our results of WEB treatment in previously treated and reopened aneurysms. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween February 2015 and December 2017, 17 patients with reopening of previously treated aneurysms were treated using the WEB device. Initial treatment was clipping in one, WEB in five and coiling in 11 aneurysms. Six aneurysms had two or three previous treatments. Mechanism of aneurysm reopening was clip remnant in one, compaction without regrowth in three, focal regrowth in five, reopening in partially thrombosed aneurysms in three and WEB compression in five aneurysms.
resultsEndovascular treatment of the recurrent aneurysm was possible in all 17 patients with good WEB position obtained. Additional devices were used in three of 17 patients (18%): coils in two and stent in one patient. No technical, hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications occurred (0%, 97.5% confidence interval 0-22%). Overall imaging result at latest follow-up was complete occlusion in five (29%), neck remnant in six (35%), aneurysm reopening in six (35%) and persistent WEB filling in one aneurysm (6%). After retreatment with the WEB, two aneurysms were again additionally treated and three aneurysms are scheduled for additional treatment. Worst results were in partially thrombosed aneurysms.
conclusionThe WEB device for recurrent aneurysms may be a feasible and safe option, especially in wide-necked, shallow aneurysm recurrences. Results were poor in partially thrombosed recurrent aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.