Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30205323›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2018

Sensory and descending motor circuitry during development and injury.

Giles W Plant, Jarret Ap Weinrich, Julia A Kaltschmidt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giles W PlantDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jarret Ap WeinrichDepartment of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Julia A KaltschmidtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: jukalts@stanford.edu.

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Inhibitory Circuitry in the Spinal CordR01NS083998 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KALTSCHMIDT, JULIA ANNA · 2013 to 2023
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proprioceptive sensory input and descending supraspinal projections are two major inputs that feed into and influence spinal circuitry and locomotor behaviors. Here we review their influence on each other during development and after spinal cord injury. We highlight developmental mechanisms of circuit formation as they relate to the sensory-motor circuit and its reciprocal interactions with local spinal interneurons, as well as competitive interactions between proprioceptive and descending supraspinal inputs in the setting of spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansInterneuronsLocomotionNerve NetNeurons, AfferentNeurons, EfferentProprioceptionSpinal CordSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID30205323
PMCPMC6242739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.