ReviewJournal of structural biology2019
Advances in instrumentation and methodology for solid-state NMR of biological assemblies.
Review in Journal of structural biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Amyloids Structural Studies and Thin Film Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Segmental Dynamics of Membranous Cholesterol are Coupled.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023Article
- Carbohydrate-aromatic interface and molecular architecture of lignocellulose.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Chemical Properties Determine Solubility and Stability in βγ-Crystallins of the Eye Lens.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021Review
- Structures of Pathological and Functional Amyloids and Prions, a Solid-State NMR Perspective.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021Review
- Structure and Aggregation Mechanisms in Amyloids.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Two decades of progress in structural and dynamic studies of amyloids by solid-state NMR.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many advances in instrumentation and methodology have furthered the use of solid-state NMR as a technique for determining the structures and studying the dynamics of molecules involved in complex biological assemblies. Solid-state NMR does not require large crystals, has no inherent size limit, and with appropriate isotopic labeling schemes, supports solving one component of a complex assembly at a time. It is complementary to cryo-EM, in that it provides local, atomic-level detail that can be modeled into larger-scale structures. This review focuses on the development of high-field MAS instrumentation and methodology; including probe design, benchmarking strategies, labeling schemes, and experiments that enable the use of quadrupolar nuclei in biomolecular NMR. Current challenges facing solid-state NMR of biological assemblies and new directions in this dynamic research area are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.