Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30204833›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hypertension2019

The Effects of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring on Sleep Quality in Men and Women With Hypertension: Dipper vs. Nondipper and Race Differences.

Andrew Sherwood, LaBarron K Hill, James A Blumenthal, Alan L Hinderliter

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew SherwoodDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
LaBarron K HillDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
James A BlumenthalDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alan L HinderliterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Depression and Heart Failure Disease ProgressionR01HL121708 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWOOD, ANDREW · 2014 to 2018
$4.2M
Biobehavioral Mechanisms of Blood Pressure DippingR01HL072390 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWOOD, ANDREW · 2003 to 2006
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL072390NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nondipping circadian blood pressure (BP) profile is associated with both poor sleep quality and increased cardiovascular risk. The present study aimed to clarify the potential confounding effects of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) used to characterize the circadian BP profile by assessing its impact on sleep quality.

methodsParticipants were 121 middle-aged men and women with untreated hypertension (age = 46 ± 8 years; 43% women; 45% African-American). Subjective sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Wrist actigraphy was used to measure sleep quality objectively as sleep efficiency (SE) and total sleep time (TST) on 7 consecutive non-ABPM days (baseline) and 3 subsequent 24-hour ABPM days.

resultsAverage ambulatory BP was 137.2 ± 10.8/84.3 ± 8.5 mm Hg during the day and 119.6 ± 12.4/69.5 ± 9.8 mm Hg at night. Using the criterion of <10% dip in systolic BP (SBP) to define nondippers, there were 40 nondippers (SBP dip = 7.3 ± 2.6%) and 81 dippers (SBP dip = 15.5 ± 3.4%). There was no effect of time on SE or TST over non-ABPM and ABPM days, suggesting that ABPM does not adversely affect sleep quality. Sleep quality was generally poorer (lower SE) in nondippers compared with dippers (P = 0.033), but differences were independent of whether or not participants were undergoing 24-hour ABPM. African-American race (P = 0.002) was also associated with lower SE.

conclusionSleep quality generally appears to be poor in men and women with untreated hypertension and especially among African-Americans. Importantly, for both dippers and nondippers, we found no evidence that ABPM had an adverse effect on sleep quality.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCircadian RhythmSleepAdultFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSex FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30204833
PMCPMC6284749
OpenAlexW2890950635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.