Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30204615›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Nathaniel J Spencer, Kate Helms Tillery, Christopher A Brown

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathaniel J SpencerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kate Helms TilleryDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Christopher A BrownDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USArizona State University · US

Funding

Training in Auditory and Vestibular NeuroscienceT32DC011499 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Karl Kandler, BILL J YATES · 2011 to 2026
$3.0M
Understanding the Benefits of Electric-acoustic StimulationR01DC008329 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BROWN, CHRISTOPHER A, DORMAN, MICHAEL F. · 2008 to 2015
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008329NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC011499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives"Channel-linked" and "multi-band" front-end automatic gain control (AGC) were examined as alternatives to single-band, channel-unlinked AGC in simulated bilateral cochlear implant (CI) processing. In channel-linked AGC, the same gain control signal was applied to the input signals to both of the two CIs ("channels"). In multi-band AGC, gain control acted independently on each of a number of narrow frequency regions per channel.

designSpeech intelligibility performance was measured with a single target (to the left, at -15 or -30°) and a single, symmetrically-opposed masker (to the right) at a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of -2 decibels. Binaural sentence intelligibility was measured as a function of whether channel linking was present and of the number of AGC bands. Analysis of variance was performed to assess condition effects on percent correct across the two spatial arrangements, both at a high and a low AGC threshold. Acoustic analysis was conducted to compare postcompressed better-ear SNR, interaural differences, and monaural within-band envelope levels across processing conditions.

resultsAnalyses of variance indicated significant main effects of both channel linking and number of bands at low threshold, and of channel linking at high threshold. These improvements were accompanied by several acoustic changes. Linked AGC produced a more favorable better-ear SNR and better preserved broadband interaural level difference statistics, but did not reduce dynamic range as much as unlinked AGC. Multi-band AGC sometimes improved better-ear SNR statistics and always improved broadband interaural level difference statistics whenever the AGC channels were unlinked. Multi-band AGC produced output envelope levels that were higher than single-band AGC.

conclusionsThese results favor strategies that incorporate channel-linked AGC and multi-band AGC for bilateral CIs. Linked AGC aids speech intelligibility in spatially separated speech, but reduces the degree to which dynamic range is compressed. Combining multi-band and channel-linked AGC offsets the potential impact of diminished dynamic range with linked AGC without sacrificing the intelligibility gains observed with linked AGC.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionCochlear ImplantationComputer SimulationFemaleHealthy VolunteersHearing Loss, BilateralHumansMaleSignal-To-Noise RatioYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30204615
PMCPMC6409108
OpenAlexW2895461585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.