Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30204248›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2018

Reduction in Nonabstinent WHO Drinking Risk Levels and Change in Risk for Liver Disease and Positive AUDIT-C Scores: Prospective 3-Year Follow-Up Results in the U.S. General Population.

Justin Knox, Melanie Wall, Katie Witkiewitz, Henry R Kranzler, Daniel Falk, Raye Litten, Karl Mann, Stephanie S O'Malley, Jennifer Scodes, Raymond Anton and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Early liver transplantation in alcohol-associated liver disease-Evolution of practice, patient selection, management, and outcomes.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026
    Review
  14. Capturing meaningful change: Initiation and maintenance of reductions in World Health Organization risk drinking levels among mandated college students.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Justin KnoxDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Melanie WallDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Katie WitkiewitzDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-3067
Henry R KranzlerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Daniel FalkNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3753-2786
Raye LittenNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland.
Karl MannDepartment of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2087-1976
Stephanie S O'MalleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jennifer ScodesNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
Raymond AntonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3417-6576
Deborah S HasinDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6533-7021
Alcohol Clinical Trials (ACTIVE) Workgroup

Funding

Substance Abuse Epidemiology Training Program (SAETP) at Columbia UniversityT32DA031099 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBORAH S HASIN, Silvia Saboia Martins · 2012 to 2026
$6.1M
Drinking levels (binge, volume) and alcohol consequences: using national data to identify clinical trial endpoints - Administrative SupplementR01AA025309 · NIAAA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HASIN, DEBORAH S · 2016 to 2021
$925k
Alcohol Clinical Trials InitiativeNIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025309NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbstinence is often the treatment aim for alcohol use disorders (AUD), but this may deter individuals who prefer drinking reduction goals from entering treatment, and be an overly restrictive end point in alcohol clinical trials. Nonabstinent drinking reductions that predict improvement in how individuals feel or function may be useful clinical trial outcomes, for example, reductions in the 4-category World Health Organization (WHO) drinking risk levels. To investigate the clinical relevance of these reductions, we examined their relationship with 2 outcomes of interest to medical providers: liver disease, and positive scores on an alcohol screening measure.

methodsCurrent drinkers in a U.S. national survey (n = 21,925) were interviewed in 2001 to 2002 (Wave 1) and re-interviewed 3 years later (Wave 2). WHO drinking risk levels, liver disease, and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) were assessed at both waves. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were used to indicate the association of change in WHO drinking risk levels with Wave 2 liver disease and AUDIT-C scores.

resultsWave 1 very-high-risk drinkers who reduced 1, 2, or 3 WHO drinking risk levels had significantly lower odds of Wave 2 liver disease (aORs = 0.34, 0.23, 0.17) and positive AUDIT-C scores (aORs = 0.27, 0.09, 0.03). Wave 1 high-risk drinkers who reduced 1 or 2 WHO risk levels had significantly lower odds of positive AUDIT-C scores (aORs = 0.61, 0.25). Adjusting for alcohol dependence or AUDIT-C scoring variations did not affect results.

conclusionsIn the highest-risk drinkers, reductions in WHO drinking risk levels predicted lower likelihood of liver disease and positive AUDIT-C scores. Results add to findings that reductions in the 4-category WHO drinking risk levels are a meaningful indicator of how individuals feel and function, and could serve as nonabstinent end points in clinical trials. Results also connect the WHO risk drinking levels to commonly used alcohol screening questions, which may be more familiar to healthcare providers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismEndpoint DeterminationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver Diseases, AlcoholicMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesResearch DesignRisk AssessmentAlcohol Use DisorderAUDIT-CDrinking ReductionLiver DiseaseWHO Risk Drinking Categories

Identifiers

PMID30204248
PMCPMC6263142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.