Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30204036›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2018

To save or degrade: balancing proteasome homeostasis to maximize cell survival.

Richard S Marshall, Richard D Vierstra

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cell Clearing Systems Bridging Neuro-Immunity and Synaptic Plasticity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard S Marshalla Department of Biology , Washington University in St. Louis , St. Louis , MO , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-1078
Richard D Vierstraa Department of Biology , Washington University in St. Louis , St. Louis , MO , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0210-3516
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Autophagic Clearance of Proteasomes and CDC48 as Models for Amyloidogenic Protein Quality Control.R01GM124452 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JEZ, JOSEPH MARTIN · 2018 to 2025
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagic degradation of proteasomes (termed proteaphagy) is a conserved mechanism by which cells eliminate excess or damaged particles. This clearance is induced rapidly when organisms are starved for nitrogen and, because proteasomes are highly abundant, their breakdown likely makes an important contribution to the amino acid pools necessary for survival. By contrast, our recent studies found that proteasomes are not degraded in response to carbon starvation, even though bulk macroautophagy is similarly activated. Instead, carbon starvation induces sequestration of proteasomes into membrane-less cytoplasmic condensates previously termed proteasome storage granules (PSGs), which protect proteasomes from autophagic degradation. Preserving proteasomes in PSGs enhances the ability of yeast cells to recover from a variety of stresses, implying that rapid remobilization of stored proteasomes when conditions improve is advantageous to cell fitness. Consequently, the choice of whether to save or degrade proteasomes can profoundly impact cell survival.

Indexed as

AutophagySaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCarbonCell SurvivalHomeostasisProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCarbonProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsATPBlm10carbon starvationpHproteaphagyproteasomeproteasome storage granulesSpg5ubiquitinUbp3

Identifiers

PMID30204036
PMCPMC6152511
OpenAlexW2890427079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.