Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30203731›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2018

Recover recovery style from psychosis: a psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Recovery Style Questionnaire (RSQ).

M Gruber, T Rumpold, B Schrank, I Sibitz, B Otzelberger, R Jahn, M Amering, A Unger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M GruberDivision of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
T RumpoldDivision of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
B SchrankDepartment of Adult Psychiatry, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Clinic Tulln, Austria.
I SibitzDivision of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
B OtzelbergerInstitute of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria.
R JahnDivision of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
M AmeringDivision of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
A UngerDivision of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe way an individual handles the experience of psychosis, the so-called 'recovery style', has been shown to substantially affect long-term outcomes. The Recovery Style Questionnaire (RSQ) measures this psychological dimension. The aim of this study was to provide a validation of the German version of the RSQ and to raise awareness for recovery-oriented approaches.

methodsThe RSQ was translated into German according to the guidelines of the WHO and patients were administered this questionnaire and measures of internalised stigma, psychotic symptoms, illness concept, empowerment, self-esteem and quality of life. Descriptive statistics were demonstrated to characterise the sample. Reliability was assessed in different forms: internal consistency, test-retest reliability and split-half reliability. Items were evaluated with descriptive data and item-total correlations. Convergent and discriminant validity were shown, and a confirmatory factor analysis was performed. In order to ameliorate the model, a post hoc model modification was done.

resultsThe sample consisted of 138 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (mean age: 35.7 years; 53.6% men; mean duration of illness: 20.6 years) with a mean RSQ overall percentage of 66.12 (s.d. ± 17.43%), mainly representing the categories 'mixed picture' and 'tends towards integration'. The reliability of the RSQ was acceptable with a Cronbach's α of 0.741 and a test-retest coefficient of 0.502. Item-total correlations were not acceptable for 27 of 39 items. Moderate evidence for convergent validity of the RSQ was found. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the 13-factor model with 39 items originally proposed was partially poorly replicated in the present sample (χ2 ratio to degrees of freedom (χ2/df) of 1.732, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.585, Normed Fit Index (NFI) of 0.414, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) of 0.508, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of 0.095). The RSQ was modified based on item-total correlations and path coefficients of the single items. The confirmatory factor analysis of the resulting one-factor model with 11 items showed adequate fit to the data (χ2/df of 1.562, CFI of 0.936, NFI of 0.847, TLI of 0.910, RMSEA of 0.083) and demonstrated good model fit.

conclusionsDespite partially insufficient psychometric data of the original RSQ, the concept of recovery style is beneficial to psychiatric research and clinical practice. The underlying idea is valuable, and the questionnaire needs further development. Therefore, a short version of the RSQ is proposed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalMental Health RecoverySocial StigmaAdolescentAdultAgedFactor Analysis, StatisticalGermanyHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsPsychotic DisordersReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingYoung AdultPsychosisrecovery style questionnaireschizophreniavalidation

Identifiers

PMID30203731
PMCPMC8061273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.