ArticleGlobal health action2018
High-risk screening and detection of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in two prefectures of China: a drug susceptibility surveillance-based secondary data analysis.
Article in Global health action, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Access to quality diagnosis and rational treatment for tuberculosis: real-world evidence from China-Gates Tuberculosis Control Project Phase III.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2021Article
- Treatment quality and outcome for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in four regions of China: a cohort study.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2020Article
- Rising challenge of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in China: a predictive study using Markov modeling.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn China, less than one-fifth of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) cases are detected. MDR-TB screening is conducted amongst the following five high-risk groups of TB patients: chronic cases, close contacts of MDR-TB patients, patients with treatment failure, relapsed and returned patients, and smear-positive patients at the end of the third month of initial treatment.
objectiveTo estimate the possibility of detecting MDR-TB cases if only the high-risk screening strategy is applied in China.
methodsA secondary analysis was applied to the surveillance-based longitudinal data of all sputum smear-positive TB patients in Prefecture E and Prefecture W of China from 2013 to 2015. The population attributable risk (PAR) was estimated using odds ratios for five risk factors/predictors and exposure proportions amongst all MDR-TB cases.
resultsA total of 3513 TB patients (2807 from Prefecture E and 706 from Prefecture W) were included. Males accounted for 77.91% (2737/3513) of the patients. The average age was 52.5 ± 20.0 years old. Overall, 40.34% (71/176) of MDR-TB patients were from the five high-risk groups during the three-year study period. The detected proportion of MDR-TB cases using the high-risk screening strategy was significantly higher in Prefecture E than in Prefecture W. The PAR% for all five risk factors/predictors was 43.4% (95% CI: 24.6-61.7%), 49.9% (95% CI: 31.3-67.0%), and 30.3% (95% CI: 12.9-50.1%) in Prefecture E and 36.6% (95% CI: 10.4-64.5%), 13.3% (95% CI: -1.7-39.7%), and -82.5% (95% CI: -117.5--11.2%) in Prefecture W in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively. The PAR% for the five specific risk factors/predictors ranged from 0.4% (95% CI: -0.2-4.8%) to 21.0% (95% CI: 13.1-30.0%) in these two prefectures.
conclusionIn general, a high-risk screening strategy would miss more than half of the MDR-TB patients because they do not belong to the five high-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.