ReviewMolecular imaging
The Molecular Imaging of Natural Killer Cells.
Review in Molecular imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- NIR-II Nanomedicine Engineered CAR-NK Cells for Precision Navigation and Potentiating Lung Cancer Immunotherapy by Remodeling Tumor Microenvironment.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Innovative optical imaging strategies for monitoring immunotherapy in the tumor microenvironments.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- ImmunoPET provides a novel way to visualize the CD103EJNMMI research · 2024Review
- Advances in NK cell therapy for brain tumors.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Review
- Emerging applications of nanotechnology in context to immunology: A comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- PET Imaging of the Natural Killer Cell Activation Receptor NKp30.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020Article
- Application of In Vivo Imaging Techniques for Monitoring Natural Killer Cell Migration and Tumor Infiltration.Cancers · 2020Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent success of autologous T cell-based therapies in hematological malignancies has spurred interest in applying similar immunotherapy strategies to the treatment of solid tumors. Identified nearly 4 decades ago, natural killer (NK) cells represent an arguably better cell type for immunotherapy development. Natural killer cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes that mediate the direct killing of transformed cells with reduced or absent major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and are the effector cells in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Unlike T cells, they do not require human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching allowing for the adoptive transfer of allogeneic NK cells in the clinic. The development of NK cell-based therapies for solid tumors is complicated by the presence of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that can potentially disarm NK cells rendering them inactive. The molecular imaging of NK cells in vivo will be crucial for the development of new therapies allowing for the immediate assessment of therapeutic response and off-target effects. A number of groups have investigated methods for detecting NK cells by optical, nuclear, and magnetic resonance imaging. In this review, we will provide an overview of the advances made in imaging NK cells in both preclinical and clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.