Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30203687›Full record

Trial reportCell transplantation2018

Comparative Study on the Application of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Combined with Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold into Femoral Bone Defects.

Pavel Šponer, Tomáš Kučera, Jindra Brtková, Karel Urban, Zuzana Kočí, Pavel Měřička, Aleš Bezrouk, Šimona Konrádová, Alžběta Filipová, Stanislav Filip

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cell transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cellular therapies for bone repair: current insights.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Current Modalities for Fracture Healing Enhancement.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedic and dentistry overview.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pavel Šponer1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Tomáš Kučera1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Jindra Brtková2 Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Karel Urban1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Zuzana Kočí3 Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel Měřička4 Tissue Bank, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Aleš Bezrouk5 Department of Medical Biophysics, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Šimona Konrádová3 Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alžběta Filipová6 Department of Radiobiology, Faculty of Military Health Sciences in Hradec Králové, University of Defence in Brno, Czech Republic.
Stanislav Filip7 Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective study sought to evaluate the healing quality of implanted ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate sown with expanded autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into femoral defects during revision hip arthroplasty. A total of 37 osseous defects in 37 patients were treated and evaluated concerning bone regeneration. Nineteen subjects received β-tricalcium phosphate graft material serving as a carrier of expanded autologous MSCs (the trial group A), nine subjects received β-tricalcium phosphate graft material only (the study group B) and nine subjects received cancellous allografts only (the control group C). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were scheduled at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively, and performed at the most recent visit as well. All observed complications were recorded during follow-up to assess the use of an ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic graft material combined with expanded MSCs in bone defect repair. The resulting data from participants with accomplished follow-up were processed and statistically evaluated with a Freeman-Halton modification of the Fischer's exact test, a P < 0.05 value was considered to be significant. Whereas no significant difference was observed between the trial group A with β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic graft material serving as a carrier of expanded autologous MSCs and control group C with cancellous impaction allografting in terms of the bone defect healing, significant differences were documented between the study group B with β-tricalcium phosphate graft material only and control group C. Regarding adverse effects, six serious events were recorded during the clinical trial with no causal relationship to the cell product. β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic graft material serving as a carrier of expanded autologous MSCs appears safe and promotes the healing of bone defects in a jeopardized and/or impaired microenvironment. This clinical trial was registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register before patient recruitment (Registration number: EudraCT number 2012-005599-33; Date of registration: 2013-02-04).

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationAdultAgedBone SubstitutesCalcium PhosphatesFemaleFemurHumansMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMiddle AgedTissue ScaffoldsTreatment Outcomebeta-tricalcium phosphateBone SubstitutesCalcium Phosphatesbone defectcell therapymesenchymal stromal cellsscaffold

Identifiers

PMID30203687
PMCPMC6180724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.