Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30203454›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2018

Social media and its relationship with mood, self-esteem and paranoia in psychosis.

N Berry, R Emsley, F Lobban, S Bucci

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Self-administration of a "mole removal pen"].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Relationship between Social Media and the Increase in Mental Health Problems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Real-time cognitive performance and positive symptom expression in schizophrenia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

N BerryDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester.ORCID 0000-0001-7414-1541
R EmsleyDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London.ORCID 0000-0002-1218-675X
F LobbanSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-4350
S BucciDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester.ORCID 0000-0002-6197-5333
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBMental Health Research UK · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0807-14075Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAn evidence-base is emerging indicating detrimental and beneficial effects of social media. Little is known about the impact of social media use on people who experience psychosis.

methodForty-four participants with and without psychosis completed 1084 assessments of social media use, perceived social rank, mood, self-esteem and paranoia over a 6-day period using an experience sampling method (ESM).

resultsSocial media use predicted low mood, but did not predict self-esteem and paranoia. Posting about feelings and venting on social media predicted low mood and self-esteem and high paranoia, whilst posting about daily activities predicted increases in positive affect and self-esteem and viewing social media newsfeeds predicted reductions in negative affect and paranoia. Perceptions of low social rank when using social media predicted low mood and self-esteem and high paranoia. The impact of social media use did not differ between participants with and without psychosis; although, experiencing psychosis moderated the relationship between venting and negative affect. Social media use frequency was lower in people with psychosis.

conclusionFindings show the potential detrimental impact of social media use for people with and without psychosis. Despite few between-group differences, overall negative psychological consequences highlight the need to consider use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AffectSchizophreniaSelf ConceptSocial BehaviorSocial MediaAdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHierarchy, SocialHumansMaleMiddle AgedParanoid DisordersPsychotic DisordersYoung Adultbehaviourpsychosisschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID30203454
PMCPMC6221086
OpenAlexW2890285745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.