ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2019
Biologics for childhood systemic vasculitis.
Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cutaneous signs of selected cardiovascular disorders: A narrative review.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Review
- Ultrasound evaluation of endothelial dysfunction in immunoglobulin-resistant children with acute Kawasaki disease.Clinical rheumatology · 2022Article
- Second and Third Generational Advances in Therapies of the Immune-Mediated Kidney Diseases in Children and Adolescents.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Clinical and Pathophysiological Insights Into Immunological Mediated Glomerular Diseases in Childhood.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances have allowed better understanding of vasculitis pathogenesis and led to more targeted therapies. Two pivotal randomized controlled trials, RITUXVAS and rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis (RAVE), provide high-quality evidence demonstrating rituximab (RTX) is efficacious in inducing remission in adult ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients compared with cyclophosphamide (CYC). RAVE also demonstrated superiority of RTX to oral CYC for induction of remission in relapsing disease. Disappointingly, the RTX regimen was not associated with reduction in early serious adverse events. At least nine randomized trials are in progress, aiming to further delineate optimal dosing and duration of RTX therapy in AAV. In particular, the 6-month interim results of the PEPRS trial provide encouraging data specific to children. Due to special concerns related to growth, preservation of fertility, and potential for high cumulative medication doses, children with AAV should be considered as candidates for RTX even as a first-line remission induction therapy. Two randomized clinical trials have defined the role of infliximab in Kawasaki disease (KD), which appears to be as an alternative to a second infusion of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for treatment-resistant disease. Support for other biologics in the treatment of AAV or for biologics in the treatment of other vasculidities is largely lacking due to either unimpressive trial results or lack of trials. Except for the KD trials and the PEPRS, trials enrolling children remain scant. This review touches on the key trials and case series with biologics in the treatment of vasculitis that have influenced practice and shaped current thinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.