ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2018
Carbon Nanomaterials for Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graphene: A Multifaceted Carbon-Based Material for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Multifunctional gold nanoparticles for osteoporosis: synthesis, mechanism and therapeutic applications.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Advancements and Applications in the Composites of Silk Fibroin and Graphene-Based Materials.Polymers · 2022Review
- Nanocomposite Hydrogel Produced from PEGDA and Laponite for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Ultra-Small Lysozyme-Protected Gold Nanoclusters as Nanomedicines Inducing Osteogenic Differentiation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020Article
- In vitro osteogenesis process induced by hybrid nanohydroxyapatite/graphene nanoribbons composites.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2019Article
- High loads of nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene nanoribbon composites guided bone regeneration using an osteoporotic animal model.International journal of nanomedicine · 2019Article
- Acceleration of Bone Regeneration in Critical-Size Defect Using BMP-9-Loaded nHA/ColI/MWCNTs Scaffolds Seeded with Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.BioMed research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo identify the use of carbon nanomaterials in bone regeneration and present new data on the regenerative capacity of bone tissue in osteopenic rats treated with graphene nanoribbons (GNRs). RECENT
findingsThe results show that the physical and chemical properties of the nanomaterials are suitable for the fabrication of scaffolds intended for bone regeneration. The in vitro tests suggested a non-toxicity of the GNRs as well as improved biocompatibility and bone mineralization activity. Here, for the first time, we evaluated the potential of GNRs in remodeling and repairing bone defects in osteoporotic animal models in vivo. Interestingly, bone mineralization and the initiation of the remodeling cycle by osteoclasts/osteoblasts were observed after the implantation of GNRs, thus implying healthy bone remodeling when using GNRs. This study, therefore, has opened our perspectives and certainly calls for more attention to the use of carbon nanomaterials for a wide range of osteoporosis applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30203250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.