Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30203207›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019

Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer.

Minah Cho, Taeil Son, Hyoung-Il Kim, Sung Hoon Noh, Seohee Choi, Won Jun Seo, Chul Kyu Roh, Woo Jin Hyung

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06929949 (A Single-center, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study on the Effect of Different Digestive Tract Reconstruction Methods on Postoperative Quality of Life After Proximal Gastrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06929949 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Single-center, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study on the Effect of Different Digestive Tract Reconstruction Methods on Postoperative Quality of Life After Proximal Gastrectomy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorThe First Hospital of Jilin UniversityRan2024 to 2030Enrolled90ConditionsGastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer, Gastric Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minah ChoDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Taeil SonDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Hyoung-Il KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Sung Hoon NohDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Seohee ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Won Jun SeoDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Chul Kyu RohDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Woo Jin HyungDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea. wjhyung@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-9214
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProximal gastrectomy offers theoretical benefits over total gastrectomy in terms of hematologic and nutritional outcomes. However, little evidence confirming these benefits has been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the hematologic and nutritional outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to those of total gastrectomy.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 80 patients with stage I gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (n = 38) or total gastrectomy (n = 42) from September 2014 to December 2015. We compared hematologic (including hemoglobin, ferritin, vitamin B

resultsWe found no significant differences in changes in hemoglobin (P = 0.250) or cumulative incidence of iron deficiency anemia (P = 0.971) during a median follow-up period of 24 months (range 18-30 months) after surgery. Cumulative incidence of vitamin B

conclusionsProximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction exhibited similar outcomes in terms of hematologic and nutritional features in comparison to total gastrectomy.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyFemaleGastrectomyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeVitamin B 12 DeficiencyAnemiaDouble-tract reconstructionIron deficiencyProximal gastrectomyTotal gastrectomyVitamin B12

Identifiers

PMID30203207
OpenAlexW2890127481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.