Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30203203›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019

Intraoperative air leak test reduces the rate of postoperative anastomotic leak: analysis of 777 laparoscopic left-sided colon resections.

Marco Ettore Allaix, Adriana Lena, Maurizio Degiuli, Alberto Arezzo, Roberto Passera, Massimiliano Mistrangelo, Mario Morino

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Large Bowel Obstruction: Etiologies, Diagnosis, and Management.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anastomotic Troubleshooting.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco Ettore AllaixDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy. meallaix@gmail.com.
Adriana LenaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Maurizio DegiuliDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Alberto ArezzoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Roberto PasseraDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Massimiliano MistrangeloDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Mario MorinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence supporting the use of the air leak test (ALT) after laparoscopic left-sided colon resection (LLCR) to test the colorectal anastomosis (CA) integrity aiming at reducing the rate of postoperative CA leakage (CAL) is not conclusive. The aim of this study was to challenge the use of ALT after elective LLCR.

methodsIt is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database including all patients undergoing elective LLCR with primary CA and no proximal bowel diversion between January 1996 and June 2017. The decision to perform the ALT was based on the individual surgeon routine practice. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for CAL.

resultsA total of 777 LLCR without proximal diversion were included in the analysis: the CA was tested in 398 patients (ALT group), while intraoperative ALT was not performed in 379 patients (No-ALT group). The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics, indication, and type of procedure. Intraoperative ALT was positive in 20 (5%) patients: a stoma was created in 14 (70%) patients, while 6 (30%) patients had a suture repair alone. Overall, postoperative CAL occurred in 32 patients (4.1%): the postoperative CAL rate was lower in ALT patients (2.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.025). A reoperation was needed in 87.5% of cases. No CAL occurred in the 20 patients with intraoperative positive ALT. Multivariate analysis showed that ASA score 3-4 (OR 5.39, 95% CI 2.53-11.51, p < 0.001) and male sex (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.66-9.43, p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for postoperative CAL, while intraoperative ALT independently reduced the postoperative CAL rate (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.88, p = 0.022).

conclusionIntraoperative ALT allows to detect AL defects after LLCR that can be effectively managed intraoperatively, leading to a significant lower risk of postoperative CAL.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakColectomyElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAir leak testAnastomotic leakageColorectal cancerDiverticulitisLaparoscopicLeft hemicolectomy

Identifiers

PMID30203203
OpenAlexW2891193931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.