Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30203193›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2018

Validation of a self-reported instrument to assess work-related difficulties in patients with migraine: the HEADWORK questionnaire.

Alberto Raggi, Venusia Covelli, Erika Guastafierro, Matilde Leonardi, Chiara Scaratti, Licia Grazzi, Marco Bartolini, Giovanna Viticchi, Sabina Cevoli, Giulia Pierangeli and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06812299 (Migraine and Work-disability), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06812299 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Migraine and Work-disability: How Treatment with Monoclonal Antibodies Against CGRP Pathway Could Reduce Work-related Burden Among Migraine Population.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" FoundationRan2023 to 2024Enrolled175ConditionsHeadache (Migraine)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2024
    Review
  6. Exploring the working conditions of disabled employees: a scoping review.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Migraine in the workplace.eNeurologicalSci · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Erenumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine complicated with medication overuse headache: an observational, retrospective, 12-month real-life study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Alberto RaggiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy. alberto.raggi@istituto-besta.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7433-7779
Venusia Covellie-Campus University, Novedrate, Italy.
Erika GuastafierroNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Matilde LeonardiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Chiara ScarattiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Licia GrazziHeadache and Neuroalgology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Marco BartoliniClinica di Neurologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Giovanna ViticchiClinica di Neurologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Sabina CevoliIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia PierangeliIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Gioacchino TedeschiHeadache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonio RussoHeadache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Piero BarbantiHeadache and Pain Unit, Department of Neurological, Motor and Sensorial Sciences. IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Cinzia AuriliaHeadache and Pain Unit, Department of Neurological, Motor and Sensorial Sciences. IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Carlo LovatiNeurology Unit, Headache Center, Ospedale L, Sacco University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luca GianiNeurology Unit, Headache Center, Ospedale L, Sacco University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Fabio FredianiNeurological and Stroke Unit Department, Headache Center, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Paola Di FioreNeurological and Stroke Unit Department, Headache Center, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BonoHeadache Center, Institute of Neurology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Laura RapisardaHeadache Center, Institute of Neurology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Domenico D'AmicoHeadache and Neuroalgology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe degree to which work-related difficulties are recognized in headache research is poor and often carried out with inadequate information such as "reduced ability to work as usual", which do not capture at all the variety of difficulties and the factors that impact over them. The aim of this paper is to present the validation of the HEADWORK questionnaire, which addresses the amount and severity of difficulties in work-related tasks and the factors that impact over them.

methodsWe developed a set of items based on a previous literature review and patients' focus groups and tested it on a wide set of patients with episodic and chronic migraine attending eight different Italian headache centers. HEADWORK factor structure was assessed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis; internal consistency and construct validity were addressed as well.

resultsThe validation sample (N = 373) was mostly composed of patients with episodic migraine without aura (64.3%) and of females (81%). Factor analysis retrieved two different scales: "Work-related difficulties", composed of eleven items which explain 67.1% of the total variance, and "Factors contributing to work difficulties", composed of six items which explain 52.1% of the total variance. Both HEADWORK subscales have good measurement properties, with higher scores being associated to higher disability, lower quality of life, lower productivity, higher headache frequency and pain intensity.

conclusionsHEADWORK is a 17-item, two-scale questionnaire addressing the impact of migraine on work-related difficulties in terms of difficulties in general or specific skills, and the factors contributing to these difficulties, defined as negative impact on work tasks. It can be used to address disability weights for the purpose of calculating the burden of migraine, and to assess the balance between therapeutic and side effects of medication on productivity.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersOccupational StressPersons with DisabilitiesQuality of LifeSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesWork Capacity EvaluationWork PerformanceChronic migraineDisability evaluationEmploymentEpisodic migraineMedication overuse headacheValidation studyWork

Identifiers

PMID30203193
PMCPMC6131677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.