ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2018
Another interpretation of the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation based on Ling's adsorption theory.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spark or Sound: How Two Differing Explanatory Strategies Impact the Debate on the Physical Nature of Neuronal Excitability.Membranes · 2026Article
- What can S-shaped potential profiles tell us about the mechanism of membrane potential generation?European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2021Article
- On the Coupling between Mechanical Properties and Electrostatics in Biological Membranes.Membranes · 2021Review
- Discrete Helmholtz model: a single layer of correlated counter-ions. Metal oxides and silica interfaces, ion-exchange and biological membranes.Chemical science · 2020Review
- Cells in New Light: Ion Concentration, Voltage, and Pressure Gradients across a Hydrogel Membrane.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Comment on Tamagawa and Ikeda's reinterpretation of the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation : Are transmembrane potentials caused by polarization?European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to standard membrane theory, the generation of membrane potential is attributed to transmembrane ion transport. However, there have been a number of reports of membrane behavior in conflict with the membrane theory of cellular potential. Putting aside the membrane theory, we scrutinized the generation mechanism of membrane potential from the view of the long-dismissed adsorption theory of Ling. Ling's adsorption theory attributes the membrane potential generation to mobile ion adsorption. Although Ling's adsorption theory conflicts with the broadly accepted membrane theory, we found that it well reproduces experimentally observed membrane potential behavior. Our theoretical analysis finds that the potential formula based on the GHK eq., which is a fundamental concept of membrane theory, coincides with the potential formula based on Ling's adsorption theory. Reinterpreting the permeability coefficient in the GHK eq. as the association constant between the mobile ion and adsorption site, the GHK eq. turns into the potential formula from Ling's adsorption theory. We conclude that the membrane potential is generated by ion adsorption as Ling's adsorption theory states and that the membrane theory of cellular potential should be amended even if not discarded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30203188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.