Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30203188›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2018

Another interpretation of the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation based on Ling's adsorption theory.

Hirohisa Tamagawa, Kota Ikeda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hirohisa TamagawaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan. tmgwhrhs@gifu-u.ac.jp.
Kota IkedaGraduate School of Advanced Mathematical Sciences, Meiji University, 4-21-1, Nakano, Nakano-ku, Tokyo, 165-8525, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to standard membrane theory, the generation of membrane potential is attributed to transmembrane ion transport. However, there have been a number of reports of membrane behavior in conflict with the membrane theory of cellular potential. Putting aside the membrane theory, we scrutinized the generation mechanism of membrane potential from the view of the long-dismissed adsorption theory of Ling. Ling's adsorption theory attributes the membrane potential generation to mobile ion adsorption. Although Ling's adsorption theory conflicts with the broadly accepted membrane theory, we found that it well reproduces experimentally observed membrane potential behavior. Our theoretical analysis finds that the potential formula based on the GHK eq., which is a fundamental concept of membrane theory, coincides with the potential formula based on Ling's adsorption theory. Reinterpreting the permeability coefficient in the GHK eq. as the association constant between the mobile ion and adsorption site, the GHK eq. turns into the potential formula from Ling's adsorption theory. We conclude that the membrane potential is generated by ion adsorption as Ling's adsorption theory states and that the membrane theory of cellular potential should be amended even if not discarded.

Indexed as

Membrane PotentialsModels, BiologicalAdsorptionAssociation constantGoldman–Hodgkin–KatzLing’s adsorption theoryMembrane theoryPermeability coefficient

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.