Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30202860›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2020

Pointless spatial modeling.

Katie Wilson, Jon Wakefield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A downscaling approach to compare COVID-19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Harmonizing child mortality data at disparate geographic levels.Statistical methods in medical research · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Small Area Estimation for Disease Prevalence Mapping.International statistical review = Revue internationale de statistique · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katie WilsonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jon WakefieldDepartments of Biostatistics and Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

SPATIO-TEMPORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY: METHODS AND APPLICATIONSR01CA095994 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WAKEFIELD, JONATHAN C · 2005 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of area-level aggregated summary data is common in many disciplines including epidemiology and the social sciences. Typically, Markov random field spatial models have been employed to acknowledge spatial dependence and allow data-driven smoothing. In the context of an irregular set of areas, these models always have an ad hoc element with respect to the definition of a neighborhood scheme. In this article, we exploit recent theoretical and computational advances to carry out modeling at the continuous spatial level, which induces a spatial model for the discrete areas. This approach also allows reconstruction of the continuous underlying surface, but the interpretation of such surfaces is delicate since it depends on the quality, extent and configuration of the observed data. We focus on models based on stochastic partial differential equations. We also consider the interesting case in which the aggregate data are supplemented with point data. We carry out Bayesian inference and, in the language of generalized linear mixed models, if the link is linear, an efficient implementation of the model is available via integrated nested Laplace approximations. For nonlinear links, we present two approaches: a fully Bayesian implementation using a Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm and an empirical Bayes implementation, that is much faster and is based on Laplace approximations. We examine the properties of the approach using simulation, and then apply the model to the classic Scottish lip cancer data.

Indexed as

BiostatisticsComputer SimulationModels, StatisticalCensusesHumansKenyaLip NeoplasmsScotlandSocioeconomic FactorsChange of support problemEcological biasHamiltonian Monte CarloMarkovian Gaussian random fields

Identifiers

PMID30202860
PMCPMC7868057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.