Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30202809›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Risk factors for late bowel and bladder toxicities in NRG Oncology prostate cancer trials of high-risk patients: A meta-analysis of physician-rated toxicities.

Canhua Xiao, Jennifer Moughan, Benjamin Movsas, Andre A Konski, Gerald E Hanks, James D Cox, Mack Roach, Kenneth L Zeitzer, Colleen A Lawton, Christopher A Peters and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Canhua XiaoEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jennifer MoughanNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Benjamin MovsasHenry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Andre A KonskiUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gerald E HanksFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
James D CoxMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mack RoachUCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, California.
Kenneth L ZeitzerAlbert Einstein Medical Center (current) and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (accruals), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Colleen A LawtonFroedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin and the VAMC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Christopher A PetersNortheast Radiation Oncology Center, Dunmore, Pennsylvania.
Seth A RosenthalSutter Cancer Center (current) and Radiological Associates of Sacramento (accruals), Sacramento, California.
I-Chow Joe HsuUCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, California.
Eric M HorwitzFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mark V MishraUniversity of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jeff M MichalskiWashington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Matthew B ParliamentCross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
David P D'SouzaLondon Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie L PughNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Deborah W BrunerEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USNRG Oncology · USUniversity of California San Francisco Medical Center · USAlberta Cancer Foundation · CAFroedtert Hospital · USHenry Ford Hospital · USNortheast Radiation Oncology Center · USSutter Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Maryland Medical System · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180833NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA meta-analysis of sociodemographic variables and their association with late (>180 days from start of radiation therapy[RT]) bowel, bladder, and clustered bowel and bladder toxicities was conducted in patients with high-risk (clinical stages T2c-T4b or Gleason score 8-10 or prostate-specific antigen level >20) prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three NRG trials (RTOG 9202, RTOG 9413, and RTOG 9406) that accrued from 1992 to 2000 were used. Late toxicities were measured with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Late Radiation Morbidity Scale. After controlling for study, age, Karnofsky Performance Status, and year of accrual, sociodemographic variables were added to the model for each outcome variable of interest in a stepwise fashion using the Fine-Gray regression models with an entry criterion of 0.05.

resultsA total of 2432 patients were analyzed of whom most were Caucasian (76%), had a KPS score of 90 to 100 (92%), and received whole-pelvic RT+HT (67%). Of these patients, 13 % and 16% experienced late grade ≥2 bowel and bladder toxicities, respectively, and 2% and 3% experienced late grade ≥3 bowel and bladder toxicities, respectively. Late grade ≥2 clustered bowel and bladder toxicities were seen in approximately 1% of patients and late grade ≥3 clustered toxicities were seen in 2 patients (<1%). The multivariate analysis showed that patients who received prostate-only RT+HT had a lower risk of experiencing grade ≥2 bowel toxicities than those who received whole-pelvic RT+long-term (LT) HT (hazard ratio: 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.73;

conclusionsPatients with high-risk prostate cancer who receive whole-pelvic RT+LT HT are more likely to have a grade ≥2 bowel toxicity than those who receive prostate-only RT. LT bowel and bladder toxicities were infrequent. Future studies will need to confirm these findings utilizing current radiation technology and patient-reported outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID30202809
PMCPMC6128023
OpenAlexW2805116548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.