Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30202596›Full record

ReviewConcussion (London, England)2018

Using concurrent gait and cognitive assessments to identify impairments after concussion: a narrative review.

David R Howell, Michael W Kirkwood, Aaron Provance, Grant L Iverson, William P Meehan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Concussion (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Associations Between Prior Head Injury, Physical Functioning, and Frailty in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David R HowellThe Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.
Michael W KirkwoodDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Aaron ProvanceSports Medicine Center, Children's Hospital Colorado & University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Grant L IversonDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
William P MeehanThe Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how a concussion affects an individual is oftentimes difficult for clinicians due to the varying symptom profiles reported by the patient and the multifaceted and heterogeneous nature of the injury. Accordingly, the interpretation of postconcussion performance can be challenging, because many different testing paradigms have been reported as potentially useful in the literature. Among the types of tests clinicians use to understand how concussion affects an individual, both gait and neurocognitive evaluations have demonstrated utility. Our purpose is to describe how combined gait and cognitive (i.e., dual task), as well as single-task gait and computerized neurocognitive examinations can assist clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

attentiondual-tasklocomotionmild traumatic brain injuryneurocognitionrecovery

Identifiers

PMID30202596
PMCPMC6094155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.