ArticleConcussion (London, England)2017
Helmets in women's lacrosse: what the evidence shows.
Article in Concussion (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Headgear use in girls' lacrosse-stakeholders not ready for change.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- A Helmet of Her Own?: A Qualitative Study of Key Stakeholder Perspectives on Headgear in Girls' Lacrosse.AJPM focus · 2023Article
- Lacrosse-related injuries in boys and girls treated in U.S. emergency departments, 2000-2016.Journal of sport and health science · 2023Review
- Sport- and Gender-Based Differences in Head Impact Exposure and Mechanism in High School Sports.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Are high school girls' lacrosse players at increased risk of concussion because they are not allowed to wear the same helmet boys' lacrosse players are required to wear?Injury epidemiology · 2020Article
- Quantifying head impact exposure, mechanisms and kinematics using instrumented mouthguards in female high school lacrosse.Research in sports medicine (Print)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.