Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30202442›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2018

Chromosomes of Asian cyprinid fishes: cytogenetic analysis of two representatives of small paleotetraploid tribe Probarbini.

Pasakorn Saenjundaeng, Marcelo de Bello Cioffi, Ezequiel Aguiar de Oliveira, Alongklod Tanomtong, Weerayuth Supiwong, Sumalee Phimphan, Maria João Collares-Pereira, Alexandr Sember, Luiz Antonio Carlos Bertollo, Thomas Liehr and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Pasakorn Saenjundaeng1Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Muang District, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Marcelo de Bello Cioffi2Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP Brazil.
Ezequiel Aguiar de Oliveira2Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP Brazil.
Alongklod Tanomtong1Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Muang District, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Weerayuth Supiwong4Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Nong Kai Campus, Muang, Nong Kai Thailand.
Sumalee Phimphan1Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Muang District, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Maria João Collares-Pereira5Faculdade de Ciencias, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, PT-1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Alexandr Sember6Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 277 21 Liběchov, Czech Republic.
Luiz Antonio Carlos Bertollo2Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP Brazil.
Thomas Liehr7Institute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany.
Cassia Fernanda Yano2Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP Brazil.
Terumi Hatanaka2Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP Brazil.
Petr Ráb6Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 277 21 Liběchov, Czech Republic.
Universidade Federal de São Carlos · BRKhon Kaen University · THCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics · CZJena University Hospital · DEUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolyploidy, although still poorly explored, represents an important evolutionary event in several cyprinid clades. Herein,

resultsAlike most other paleotetraploid cyprinids (with 2n = 100), both species studied here shared 2n = 98 but differed in karyotypes:

conclusionBased on our findings, together with likely the same reduced 2n = 98 karyotypes in the remainder Probarbini species, we hypothesize that the karyotype 2n = 98 might represent a derived character, shared by all members of the Probarbini clade. Besides, we also witnessed considerable changes in the amount and distribution of certain repetitive DNA classes, suggesting complex post-polyploidization processes in this small paleotetraploid tribe.

Indexed as

Chromosomal markersCyprinidaeFish cytogeneticsMicrosatellitesrDNAs

Identifiers

PMID30202442
PMCPMC6123905
OpenAlexW2891957982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.