ArticleAmerican journal of lifestyle medicine
The Obesities: An Overview of Convergent and Divergent Paradigms.
Article in American journal of lifestyle medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of a Universal Weight Stigma Intervention on the Quality of Parent-Child Conversations About Weight.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025Trial
- The role of policy actors' belief systems and interests in framing public health nutrition problems: a case study of obesity in Australia.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Creativity in energy balance, obesity and feeding behavior research, some thoughts.Physiology & behavior · 2023Review
- Disrupting Essentialism in Medical Genetics Education.Medical science educator · 2022Article
- Gut Microbiota and Obesity: Potential Therapeutic Targets and Probiotic Treatment.American journal of lifestyle medicineReview
- Bridging the Science-Practice Gap in Obesity Treatment.American journal of lifestyle medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of obesity lends itself to difficulties not only due to our imprecise ability to measure body composition, food consumption, and physical activity but also, even more important, due to complexities involved in defining and conceptualizing obesity. For centuries, obesity has been considered a disease, although researchers and clinicians cannot agree on definitions of "disease" or, if it is one, whether obesity is a disease of metabolism, inflammation, brown fat, chronobiology, the blood-brain barrier, the right brain, or even of infectious origin. The concept of "obesity" as a disease remains controversial to some because not everyone who has excess adipose tissue has any evidence of disease. Obesity, though, has also been considered a sin, a crime against society, an aesthetic crime, a self-inflicted disability, an example of body diversity, a failure in the regulation of energy balance, an appropriate or even inappropriate adaptation to our increasingly obesogenic environment, a genetic disorder, and a psychological/behavioral disorder of overeating involving self-regulation or even addiction. Five major paradigms-medical, sociocultural, evolutionary, environmental, and psychological/behavioral, all with their own subcategorical models-have been identified. All 5 paradigms are required because we are dealing not with "obesity" but with a plurality, the "obesities."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.