Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30202210›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental neuroscience2018

Relationships in Ongoing Structural Maintenances of the Two Cerebral Cortices of an Individual Brain.

Hong Xie, John Wall, Xin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong XieWilliam R. Bauer Human Brain MRI Laboratory and Department of Neurosciences, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
John WallWilliam R. Bauer Human Brain MRI Laboratory and Department of Neurosciences, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0947-2162
Xin WangWilliam R. Bauer Human Brain MRI Laboratory and Department of Neurosciences, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A human brain has separate left and right cerebral cortices, each of which must be continuously structurally maintained during adulthood. There is no understanding of how ongoing structural maintenances of separate parts of a mature individual brain, including the 2 cortices, are related. To explore this issue, this study used an unconventional N-of-1 magnetic resonance imaging time-series paradigm to identify relationships between maintenances of structural thicknesses of the 2 cortices in an adult human brain over week intervals for 6 months. The results suggest that maintenances of left and right cortical thicknesses were symmetrically related in some, but asymmetrically related in other, respects. For matched times, thickness magnitudes and variations on the 2 sides were positively correlated and appeared to reflect maintenance symmetry. Maintenance relationships also extended from earlier to later times with temporal continuity and apparent "if-then" contingencies which were reflected in symmetry and asymmetry dynamics spanning 1- to 2-week periods. The findings suggest concepts of individual brain cortical maintenance symmetry, asymmetry, and temporal continuity dynamics that have not been previously recognized. They have implications for defining cortical maintenance traits or states and for development of N-of-1 precision medicine paradigms that can contribute to understanding individual brain health.

Indexed as

Brain maintenancecortical symmetry/asymmetrycortical thicknessMRI N-of-1 time seriesprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID30202210
PMCPMC6122241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.