Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30202191›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2018

Commentary: Applying the Community Partners in Care Approach to the Opioid Crisis.

Kenneth B Wells, Katherine E Watkins, Brian Hurley, Lingqi Tang, Felica Jones, James Gilmore

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenneth B WellsDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Semel Institute, Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, RAND Health Program, Greater Los Angeles Veteran Affairs Health Care System, Los Angeles CA.
Katherine E WatkinsRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Brian HurleyLos Angeles Country Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles, CA.
Lingqi TangDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute at UCLA, Los Angeles CA.
Felica JonesHealthy African American Families Phase II, Los Angeles, CA.
James GilmoreBehavioral Health Services, Gardena, CA.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Pathways to Reducing Disparities in Depression OutcomesR01MD007721 · NIMHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI MIRANDA, JEANNE, WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Given national concern over rising mortality from opioid use disorders (OUD) and challenges to increasing OUD treatment access, a coalition approach may hold promise to improve access and outcomes for diverse populations. We present considerations of a community-partnered working group on adapting the Community Partners in Care (CPIC) study and coalition approach to OUD. Method: During January 2016 through January 2017, academic, provider, consumer and policy stakeholders reviewed options to adapt CPIC's Resources for Services (RS) for individual program technical assistance and Community Engagement and Planning (CEP) for coalition support to OUD treatments, integrating stakeholder input into design options with estimated sample sizes. Findings: The working group recommended Community Reinforcement and Family Treatment (CRAFT) as a stakeholder-support intervention to facilitate uptake and adherence to Medications for Addiction Treatment (MAT). Recommended implementation interventions for MAT/CRAFT were expert technical assistance supplemented by organizational readiness, and CEP for coalition support with a Learning Collaborative. Power estimation suggests that to compare implementation intervention effects on abstinence would require a somewhat larger enrolled sample and 3-4 times the screening sample as CPIC, and for mortality, at least 5-10 times the enrolled sample as CPIC. Discussion: Stakeholders viewed the CPIC design and interventions as feasible and acceptable as community-wide approaches for addressing the opioid epidemic, but comparing impacts on mortality would require large, multi-site trials.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesOpioid-Related DisordersHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntersectoral CollaborationPublic HealthUnited StatesCoalitionsCommunity EngagementOpioid Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID30202191
PMCPMC6128328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.