Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30202189›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2018

Growing a Community-Academic Partnership: Lessons Learned in Forming a Qualitative Interview Team for the Community Partners in Care Study.

Gera L Anderson, S Megan Heller, Esmeralda Pulido, Pluscedia Williams, Alisa Orduna, Elizabeth Bromley, Juanita Booker-Vaughns

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gera L AndersonCalifornia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice, Stockton, CA.
S Megan HellerUCLA Center for Health Services and Society, Los Angeles, CA.
Esmeralda PulidoLA Care Health Plan, Alhambra, CA.
Pluscedia WilliamsDepartment of Community Engagement, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine & Science; Los Angeles, CA.
Alisa OrdunaDepartment of Psychology, Pacifica Graduate Institute, Carpinteria, CA.
Elizabeth BromleyDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Juanita Booker-VaughnsDepartment of Community Engagement, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine & Science; Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARER01MH078853 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2007 to 2011
$6.0M
PATHWAYS TO OVERCOMING DISPARITIES IN DEPRESSIONR01MH061570 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2001 to 2007
$3.6M
Pathways to Reducing Disparities in Depression OutcomesR01MD007721 · NIMHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI MIRANDA, JEANNE, WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007721NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061570NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By engaging, partnering, and building trust with community members, research on vulnerable populations may offer opportunities to improve population health in communities that suffer from health disparities. While the literature on participatory and partnered approaches offers techniques and strategies for forming community-academic partnerships, less information is available about how partnerships can grow and evolve over time. In this article, we describe the expansion of a long-standing partnership that uses principles of community partnered participatory research (CPPR), a variant of community-based participatory research (CBPR). We outline the preparation and executive phases of conducting qualitative interviewing with highly vulnerable study participants who have already been participants in a longitudinal survey. We describe the challenges and concerns at each phase of the research and summarize some lessons learned. To grow and evolve, the partnership must constantly be reaffirmed in the experiences of new members.

Indexed as

Intersectoral CollaborationPublic HealthCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsDepressionHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInterviews as TopicNeeds AssessmentPatient Care TeamQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementCommunity Partnered Participatory ResearchCommunity Partners in Care (CPIC)DepressionQualitative InterviewingTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID30202189
PMCPMC6128348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.