Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30202182›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2018

Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards.

Ashley Wennerstrom, Benjamin F Springgate, Felica Jones, Diana Meyers, Norris Henderson, Anthony Brown, Anjali Niyogi, Dolfinette Martin, Jessie Smith, Angela L Kirkland and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stakeholder-engaged research is necessary across the criminal-legal spectrum.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley WennerstromTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
Benjamin F SpringgateLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA.
Felica JonesHealthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA.
Diana MeyersAnna's Place, New Orleans, LA.
Norris HendersonVoice of the Experienced, New Orleans, LA.
Anthony BrownHealthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA.
Anjali NiyogiTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
Dolfinette MartinVoice of the Experienced, New Orleans, LA.
Jessie SmithTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
Angela L KirklandTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
Loretta JonesHealthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA.
Keith C NorrisGeffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Tulane University · USHealthy African American Families II · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) supports patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research (CER) including health disparities and engagement portfolios. In 2013, PCORI launched the Pipeline to Proposal (P2P) mechanism to support development of novel patient- and stakeholder-centered partnerships focused on designing clinical CER funding proposals. By providing a tiered structure of successive small contracts and technical assistance, the P2P mechanism encourages development of new research partnerships among diverse stakeholders. As a comparatively new field, patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) has few well-delineated methods for engaging patients and other non-scientists in effective teams with academics or clinicians to develop and implement rigorous, scientific research proposals. Community partnered participatory research (CPPR) provides a useful framework for structuring new partnerships. In this article we highlight the origins, development, and prospects of three current examples of funded P2P initiatives based in New Orleans and Los Angeles. We outline how these projects - Prisoner to Patient, the NOLA Partnership, and Resilience Among African American Men - use CPPR principles. We also describe how they have collaborated with, and contributed to, a two-way learning and knowledge exchange among members of the PCORI-funded Community and Patient Partnered Research Network. Lessons learned may be applicable to other groups planning to create new partnerships focused on implementing PCOR.

Indexed as

Patient Outcome AssessmentPatient ParticipationStakeholder ParticipationAwards and PrizesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity NetworksHumansLos AngelesModels, OrganizationalNew OrleansResearch DesignCommunity-Academic PartnershipCommunity Partnered Participatory ResearchHealth Disparities ResearchPatient Centered Outcomes ResearchPCORI

Identifiers

PMID30202182
PMCPMC6128329
OpenAlexW2890418678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.