ReviewCell death and differentiation2019
Paving the way for precision medicine v2.0 in intensive care by profiling necroinflammation in biofluids.
Review in Cell death and differentiation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical implications of ferroptosis in critical illness: a narrative review.Journal of intensive care · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Immunomodulation in Cardiovascular Disease: Anti-inflammatory Strategies and Landmark Trials.Cureus · 2025Review
- Potential of biomarker-based enrichment strategies to identify critically ill patients for emerging cell death interventions.Cell death and differentiation · 2025Article
- Ferroptosis and pyroptosis signatures in critical COVID-19 patients.Cell death and differentiation · 2023Article
- Serine and one-carbon metabolisms bring new therapeutic venues in prostate cancer.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- Can Big Data and Machine Learning Improve Our Understanding of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome?Cureus · 2021Review
- Emerging immune and cell death mechanisms in stroke: Saponins as therapeutic candidates.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2020Review
- "Point of no return" in unilateral renal ischemia reperfusion injury in mice.Journal of biomedical science · 2020Article
- Dynamical modeling of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the early stage of septic shock.In silico biology · 2020Article
- The Role of Adipokines as Circulating Biomarkers in Critical Illness and Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- DNA-Based Biomaterials for Immunoengineering.Advanced healthcare materials · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current clinical diagnosis is typically based on a combination of approaches including clinical examination of the patient, clinical experience, physiologic and/or genetic parameters, high-tech diagnostic medical imaging, and an extended list of laboratory values mostly determined in biofluids such as blood and urine. One could consider this as precision medicine v1.0. However, recent advances in technology and better understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying disease will allow us to better characterize patients in the future. These improvements will enable us to distinguish patients who have similar clinical presentations but different cellular and molecular responses. Treatments will be able to be chosen more "precisely", resulting in more appropriate therapy, precision medicine v2.0. In this review, we will reflect on the potential added value of recent advances in technology and a better molecular understanding of necrosis and inflammation for improving diagnosis and treatment of critically ill patients. We give a brief overview on the mutual interplay between necrosis and inflammation, which are two crucial detrimental factors in organ and/or systemic dysfunction. One of the challenges for the future will thus be the cellular and molecular profiling of necroinflammation in biofluids. The huge amount of data generated by profiling biomolecules and single cells through, for example, different omic-approaches is needed for data mining methods to allow patient-clustering and identify novel biomarkers. The real-time monitoring of biomarkers will allow continuous (re)evaluation of treatment strategies using machine learning models. Ultimately, we may be able to offer precision therapies specifically designed to target the molecular set-up of an individual patient, as has begun to be done in cancer therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.