Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201953›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2018

Cerebral autoregulation and activity after propofol for endotracheal intubation in preterm neonates.

Liesbeth Thewissen, Alexander Caicedo, Anneleen Dereymaeker, Sabine Van Huffel, Gunnar Naulaers, Karel Allegaert, Anne Smits

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Propofol for endotracheal intubation in neonates: a dose-finding trial.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cerebral autoregulation in pediatric and neonatal intensive care: A scoping review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liesbeth ThewissenDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. liesbeth.thewissen@uzleuven.be.
Alexander CaicedoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, ESAT-Stadius, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anneleen DereymaekerDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sabine Van HuffelDepartment of Electrical Engineering, ESAT-Stadius, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gunnar NaulaersDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Karel AllegaertDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anne SmitsDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing use of propofol in neonates, observations on cerebral effects are limited.

aimTo investigate cerebral autoregulation (CAR) and activity after propofol for endotracheal intubation in preterm neonates.

methodsTwenty-two neonates received propofol before intubation as part of a published dose-finding study. Mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), near-infrared spectroscopy-derived cerebral oxygenation (rScO

resultsAfter intubation with a median propofol dose of 1 (0.5-4.5) mg/kg, rScO

conclusionsDrug-related hypotension and decreased cerebral activity after intubation with low propofol doses in preterm neonates were observed, without evidence of cerebral ischemic hypoxia. CAR remained intact during drug-related hypotension in 95.5% of patients. Cerebral monitoring including CAR clarifies the cerebral impact of MABP fluctuations.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealAnesthetics, IntravenousArea Under CurveBlood PressureBrainDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectroencephalographyFemaleHomeostasisHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePropofolAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofol

Identifiers

PMID30201953
OpenAlexW2891497876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.