Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201941›Full record

ArticleCancers2018

High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Monotherapy versus Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Hideya Yamazaki, Koji Masui, Gen Suzuki, Satoaki Nakamura, Daisuke Shimizu, Tatsuyuki Nishikawa, Haruumi Okabe, Ken Yoshida, Tadayuki Kotsuma, Eiichi Tanaka and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hideya YamazakiDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. hideya10@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7508-7217
Koji MasuiDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. mc0515kj@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
Gen SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. gensuzu@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-6018-468X
Satoaki NakamuraDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. satoaki@nakamura.pro.
Daisuke ShimizuDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. dshimizu@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
Tatsuyuki NishikawaDepartment of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji-City, Kyoto 611-0021, Japan. nishikawa2017@excite.co.jp.
Haruumi OkabeDepartment of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji-City, Kyoto 611-0021, Japan. h-okabe@takedahp.or.jp.
Ken YoshidaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, 2-1-14, Hoenzaka, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-0006, Japan. rad113@osaka-med.ac.jp.
Tadayuki KotsumaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, 2-1-14, Hoenzaka, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-0006, Japan. tkotsuma-osaka@umin.net.
Eiichi TanakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, 2-1-14, Hoenzaka, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-0006, Japan. tanaka@onh.go.jp.
Keisuke OtaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. ohtanik@radonc.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Yasuo YoshiokaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. yasuo.yoshioka@jfcr.or.jp.
Kazuhiko OgawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. kogawa@radonc.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare outcomes between high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-BT) monotherapy and image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) for localized prostate cancer. We examined 353 HDR-BT and 270 IG-IMRT patients. To reduce background selection bias, we used the method of inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) with propensity scores. The actuarial five-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 92.9% and 96.7% (

Indexed as

high-dose-rate brachytherapyimage guided intensity modulated radiotherapyprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID30201941
PMCPMC6162691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.