Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201929›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Strategic Uses of Facebook in Zika Outbreak Communication: Implications for the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Model.

May O Lwin, Jiahui Lu, Anita Sheldenkar, Peter J Schulz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Enhancing risk and crisis communication with computational methods: A systematic literature review.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Use of Digital Tools in Arbovirus Surveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

May O LwinWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637718, Singapore. tmaylwin@ntu.edu.sg.
Jiahui LuWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637718, Singapore. jhlu@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-2984-7435
Anita SheldenkarWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637718, Singapore. anitas@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-5402-9269
Peter J SchulzInstitute of Communication and Health, Università Della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland. peter.schulz@usi.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While social media has been increasingly used for communication of infectious disease outbreaks, little is known about how social media can improve strategic communication across various stages of the health crisis. The Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Model (Reynolds & Seeger, 2005; CERC) outlines strategies across different crisis phases and can guide crisis communication on social media. This research therefore investigates how social media can be utilized to implement and adapt the CERC model, by examining the strategic uses of Facebook in communicating the recent Zika epidemic by health authorities in Singapore. Zika-related Facebook posts of three main Singapore health agencies published within the one year period from January 2016 to December 2016 were thematically analysed. Results suggest that Facebook was used to communicate the crisis strategically, which supported and added to the CERC model. Novel uses of Facebook for outbreak communication were demonstrated, including promoting public common responsibility for disease prevention and expressing regards to the public for cooperation. Results also suggested that preparedness messages might be the most effective, as they produced a great level of public engagement. The adaptability of the CERC model in social media contexts to improve crisis communication is discussed.

Indexed as

CommunicationDisease OutbreaksSocial MediaHumansRiskSingaporeZika Virus InfectionCERCcrisis communicationFacebookoutbreak communicationpublic healthsocial mediaZika

Identifiers

PMID30201929
PMCPMC6163817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.