Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201844›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Towards systematic, data-driven validation of a collaborative, multi-scale model of

Richard C Gerkin, Russell J Jarvis, Sharon M Crook

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On the Role of Theory and Modeling in Neuroscience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Connectome to behaviour: modellingPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  5. OpenWorm: overview and recent advances in integrative biological simulation ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard C GerkinSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA rgerkin@asu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2940-3378
Russell J JarvisSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Sharon M CrookSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2940-3378

Funding

Tools for Model Discovery, Validation and Selection in Neuroscience with NeuroMLR01MH106674 · NIMH · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI CROOK, SHARON MARIE · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
CRCNS Data Sharing: Exchange and Evaluation of Reduced Neuron ModlesR01EB021711 · NIBIB · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI GERKIN, RICHARD C · 2015 to 2017
$390k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021711NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The OpenWorm Project is an international open-source collaboration to create a multi-scale model of the organism

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyComputer SimulationConnectomeModels, BiologicalinformaticsmodellingPythonunit-testing

Identifiers

PMID30201844
PMCPMC6158230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.