Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201842›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

c302: a multiscale framework for modelling the nervous system of

Padraig Gleeson, David Lung, Radu Grosu, Ramin Hasani, Stephen D Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. On collective behavior inFrontiers in neurorobotics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A complete biomechanical model ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Unsupervised learning of control signals and their encodings inJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Connectome to behaviour: modellingPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. OpenWorm: overview and recent advances in integrative biological simulation ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Padraig GleesonDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK p.gleeson@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5963-8576
David LungCyber-Physical Systems, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Radu GrosuCyber-Physical Systems, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Ramin HasaniCyber-Physical Systems, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Stephen D LarsonOpenWorm Foundation, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5397-6208

Funding

Wellcome Trust 101445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The OpenWorm project has the ambitious goal of producing a highly detailed

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNervous System Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansComputer SimulationConnectomeNervous SystemC. eleganscomputational neuroscienceopen sourcesimulationstandardization

Identifiers

PMID30201842
PMCPMC6158223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.