Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201839›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Powerful and interpretable behavioural features for quantitative phenotyping of

Avelino Javer, Lidia Ripoll-Sánchez, André E X Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Application ofBiomolecules & therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-Throughput Toxicity Screening withEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. eNeuro · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neuroendocrine Control of Synaptic Transmission by PHAC-1 inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Avelino JaverMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, UK.
Lidia Ripoll-SánchezMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, UK.
André E X BrownMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, UK andre.brown@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1324-8764

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Medical Research Council MC-A658-5TY30Medical Research Council MC_UP_1102/6NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behaviour is a sensitive and integrative readout of nervous system function and therefore an attractive measure for assessing the effects of mutation or drug treatment on animals. Video data provide a rich but high-dimensional representation of behaviour, and so the first step of analysis is often some form of tracking and feature extraction to reduce dimensionality while maintaining relevant information. Modern machine-learning methods are powerful but notoriously difficult to interpret, while handcrafted features are interpretable but do not always perform as well. Here, we report a new set of handcrafted features to compactly quantify

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCaenorhabditis elegansLocomotionOptogeneticsPhenotypeC. eleganscomputational ethologyphenotypingworm tracking

Identifiers

PMID30201839
PMCPMC6158219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.