Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201838›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

From head to tail: a neuromechanical model of forward locomotion in

Eduardo J Izquierdo, Randall D Beer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuronal sensorimotor integration guiding salt concentration navigation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A complete biomechanical model ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Connectome to behaviour: modellingPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eduardo J IzquierdoCognitive Science Program, School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA edizquie@indiana.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2008-290X
Randall D BeerCognitive Science Program, School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Google (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With 302 neurons and a near-complete reconstruction of the neural and muscle anatomy at the cellular level,

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansFeedback, SensoryLocomotionMotor Neuronsinvertebratelocomotionmotor controlneuromechanical modelproprioception

Identifiers

PMID30201838
PMCPMC6158225
OpenAlexW2892143652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.