Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201836›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Sensorimotor integration in

Harris S Kaplan, Annika L A Nichols, Manuel Zimmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. FUNCTIONS OFbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Harris S KaplanResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-5714
Annika L A NicholsResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0388-904X
Manuel ZimmerResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria manuel.zimmer@imp.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-787X
Google (United States) · US

Funding

European Research Council 281869Howard Hughes Medical Institute UNS47805Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nematode

Indexed as

Nervous System Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansLocomotionMotor NeuronsSensory Receptor CellsC. elegansmixed selectivitymotor controlneuronal population dynamicssensorimotor integrationwhole-brain imaging

Identifiers

PMID30201836
PMCPMC6158224
OpenAlexW2891922732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.