Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201835›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Quan Wen, Shangbang Gao, Mei Zhen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Motor Rhythm Dissection From the Backward Circuit inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Database ofMolecules and cells · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Connectome to behaviour: modellingPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Quan WenHefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, People's Republic of China qwen@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-0268-8403
Shangbang GaoCollege of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, People's Republic of China sgao@hust.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-5431-4628
Mei ZhenThe Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital; Department of Molecular Genetics, Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1XS, Canada zhen@lunenfeld.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0086-9622

Funding

CIHR MOP123250CIHR MOP93619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrinsic oscillatory activity of central pattern generators underlies motor rhythm. We review and discuss recent findings that address the origin of

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansInterneuronsLocomotionMotor NeuronsPeriodicitycentral pattern generatorsfunctional compressionmotor neuronneuromechanical modelprojection-premotor interneuronproprioception

Identifiers

PMID30201835
PMCPMC6158216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.