Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201795›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Economic returns to medical research funding.

Jonathan Grant, Martin J Buxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Tracing Long-Term Outcomes of Basic Research Using Citation Networks.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2020
    Article
  15. The landscape of biomedical research funding in Brazil: a current overview.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan GrantPolicy Institute at King's, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1646-3486
Martin J BuxtonHealth Economic Research Group, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L010801/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the publication of the final paper in a planned series of four studies estimating the economic returns from biomedical and health research, we reflect on what we have learnt from these types of assessment.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCharitiesCost-Benefit AnalysisEconomics, MedicalFinancing, GovernmentHumansUnited Kingdomcardiologyhealth economicsmusculoskeletal diseaseoncologyscience policy

Identifiers

PMID30201795
PMCPMC6144334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.