SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2018
Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 358 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
358 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 576 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics associated with pathological complete response in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic significance of tumoral Siglec-15 expression in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The association of PD-L1 expression status and the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-related toxicity profile in non-small cell lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Clinicopathological and prognostic value of tertiary lymphoid structures in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting immunotherapy response of advanced bladder cancer through a meta-analysis of six independent cohorts.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- Association between the expression status of programmed cell death ligand 1 and the efficacy of pan-cancer neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- The application of random forest-based models in prognostication of gastrointestinal tract malignancies: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- A system review of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade for breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in first and second-line treatments for recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs with a focus on PD-L1 expression.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in low programmed death-ligand 1-expressing population.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Biomarkers and factors in small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- The effects of statins in patients with advanced-stage cancers - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- The prognostic value of the tertiary lymphoid structure in gastrointestinal cancers.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Imaging-based adipose biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of metformin therapy in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of 22 randomised controlled trials.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Model-informed drug development of envafolimab, a subcutaneously injectable PD-L1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.The oncologist · 2024Trial
- A phase Ib/II study of BLU-554, a fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 inhibitor in combination with CS1001, an anti-PD-L1, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.Investigational new drugs · 2023Trial
- Phase II trial of nivolumab monotherapy and biomarker screening in patients with chemo-refractory germ cell tumors.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2022Trial
- Comparative Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammation-Based Biomarkers in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line Immunotherapy.Biomedicines · 2026Article
298 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative.
designMeta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. REVIEW
methodsStudies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods.
results4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time.
conclusionsPD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.