Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201639›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2018

Predicting an Unfavorable Course of Dizziness in Older Patients.

Hanneke Stam, Otto R Maarsingh, Martijn W Heymans, Henk C P M van Weert, Johannes C van der Wouden, Henriëtte E van der Horst

Open access · diamondAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Ten Vestibular Tools for Primary Care.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hanneke StamDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Iniversiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands stam.h@vumc.nl.
Otto R MaarsinghDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Iniversiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn W HeymansDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Iniversiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk C P M van WeertDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes C van der WoudenDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Iniversiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henriëtte E van der HorstDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Iniversiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBecause dizziness in older people is often chronic and can substantially affect daily functioning, it is important to identify those at risk for an unfavorable course of dizziness to optimize their care. We aimed to develop and externally validate a prediction model for an unfavorable course of dizziness in older patients in primary care, and to construct an easy-to-use risk prediction tool.

methodsWe used data from 2 prospective cohorts: a development cohort with 203 patients aged 65 years or older who consulted their primary care physician for dizziness and had substantial dizziness-related impairment (Dizziness Handicap Inventory [DHI] ≥30), and a validation cohort with 415 patients aged 65 years or older who consulted their primary care physician for dizziness of any severity. An unfavorable course was defined as presence of substantial dizziness-related impairment (DHI ≥30) after 6 months.

resultsPrevalence of an unfavorable course of dizziness was 73.9% in the development cohort and 43.6% in the validation cohort. Predictors in the final model were the score on the screening version of the DHI, age, history of arrhythmia, and looking up as a provoking factor. The model showed good calibration and fair discrimination (area under the curve = 0.77). On external validation, discriminative ability remained stable (area under the curve = 0.78). The constructed risk score was strongly correlated with the prediction model. Performance measures for risk score cut-off values are presented to determine the optimal cut-off point for clinical practice.

conclusionsWe developed an easy-to-use risk score for dizziness-related impairment in primary care. The risk score, consisting of only 4 predictors, will help primary care physicians identify patients at high risk for an unfavorable course of dizziness.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationGeriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overCalibrationDizzinessFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsPrimary Health CarePrognosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsdizzinessfallsgeriatricsolder adultspractice-based researchprimary carerisk factorsrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID30201639
PMCPMC6131005
OpenAlexW2890881839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.