ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Extravasation of Brownian Spheroidal Nanoparticles through Vascular Pores.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simple analytical solutions for the optical properties of multilayered confocal prolate spheroids in the quasistatic approximation.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Drug-loaded nanoparticles for cancer therapy: A high-throughput multicellular agent-based modeling study.Journal of theoretical biology · 2026Article
- Advances in the treatment of atherosclerosis with ligand-modified nanocarriers.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024Review
- Nanoparticle-mediated cancer cell therapy: basic science to clinical applications.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2023Review
- Real-time imaging of nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent flow, extravasation, and diffusion through an extracellular matrix using a microfluidic model.Lab on a chip · 2023Article
- Nanomedicines for cardiovascular disease.Nature cardiovascular research · 2023Review
- The Role ofFrontiers in digital health · 2022Review
- Macrophage-Targeted Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes Stimulate Phagocytosis via pH-dependent Drug Release.Nano research · 2021Article
- Nanotherapeutic Shots through the Heart of Plaque.ACS nano · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In modern cancer treatment, there is significant interest in studying the use of drug molecules either directly injected into the bloodstream or delivered by nanoparticle (NP) carriers of various shapes and sizes. During treatment, these carriers may extravasate through pores in the tumor vasculature that form during angiogenesis. We provide an analytical, computational, and experimental examination of the extravasation of point particles (e.g., drug molecules) and finite-sized spheroidal particles. We study the advection-diffusion process in a model microvasculature, consisting of a shear flow over and a pressure-driven suction flow into a circular pore in a flat surface. For point particles, we provide an analytical formula [Formula: see text] for the dimensionless Sherwood number S, i.e., the extravasation rate, in terms of the pore entry resistance (Damköhler number κ), the shear rate (Péclet number P), and the suction flow rate (suction strength Q). Brownian dynamics (BD) simulations verify this result, and our simulations are then extended to include finite-sized NPs, in which no analytical solutions are available. BD simulations indicate that particles of different geometries have drastically different extravasation rates in different flow conditions. In general, extreme aspect ratio particles provide a greater flux through the pore because of favorable alignment with streamlines entering the pore and less hindered interaction with the pore. We validate the BD simulations by measuring the in vitro transport of both bacteriophage MS2 (a spherical NP) and free dye (a model drug molecule) across a porous membrane. Despite their vastly different sizes, BD predicts S = 8.53 E-4 and S = 27.6 E-4, and our experiments agree favorably, with S
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.