Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201093›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

The influence of the descending pain modulatory system on infant pain-related brain activity.

Sezgi Goksan, Luke Baxter, Fiona Moultrie, Eugene Duff, Gareth Hathway, Caroline Hartley, Irene Tracey, Rebeccah Slater

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A review of descending pain modulation in humans.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The fetal pain paradox.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sezgi GoksanDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8836-0614
Luke BaxterDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9548-7162
Fiona MoultrieDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1431-791X
Eugene DuffDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8795-5472
Gareth HathwaySchool of Life Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4347-9667
Caroline HartleyDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-0836
Irene TraceyWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rebeccah SlaterDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1595-4846
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Clinical Doctoral FellowshipWellcome 102176Wellcome Senior Research Fellowship, 207457/Z/17/ZWellcome Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102176Wellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 207457/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The descending pain modulatory system (DPMS) constitutes a network of widely distributed brain regions whose integrated function is essential for effective modulation of sensory input to the central nervous system and behavioural responses to pain. Animal studies demonstrate that young rodents have an immature DPMS, but comparable studies have not been conducted in human infants. In Goksan et al. (2015) we used functional MRI (fMRI) to show that pain-related brain activity in newborn infants is similar to that observed in adults. Here, we investigated whether the functional network connectivity strength across the infant DPMS influences the magnitude of this brain activity. FMRI scans were collected while mild mechanical noxious stimulation was applied to the infant's foot. Greater pre-stimulus functional network connectivity across the DPMS was significantly associated with lower noxious-evoked brain activity (p = 0.0004, r = -0.86, n = 13), suggesting that in newborn infants the DPMS may regulate the magnitude of noxious-evoked brain activity.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingEvoked PotentialsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNerve NetPainPhysical Stimulationbraindescending pain modulationhumaninfantneurosciencepain

Identifiers

PMID30201093
PMCPMC6133549
OpenAlexW2891497718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.