ArticleTurkish journal of urology2019
Is there a difference in the number of interstitial cells, neurons, presence of fibrosis and inflammation in ureteropelvic junction tissues of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction with and without crossing vessels?
Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Crossing Vessel in Pelvi Ureteric Junction Obstruction: A Histopathological Analysis.Turkish journal of urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe compared the number of interstitial cells (ICs), nerves, presence of fibrosis and inflammation at the level of full-thickness human ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) tissues obtained from normal subjects, and patients with UPJ obstruction with and without crossing vessels. MATERIAL AND
methodsNormal UPJ tissues (n=12) histopathologically confirmed to be without tumor involvement were obtained from subjects who underwent radical nephrectomy for kidney mass. Additional UPJ tissues were obtained from patients who underwent pyeloplasty due to UPJ obstruction. Crossing vessel was identified in 17 patients. In 57 patients, no crossing-vessel was noted. ICs were stained immunohistochemically with anti-human CD117 (c-kit) antibody. Neural tissue was stained with S-100. The numbers of ICs and neurons were compared between the groups: controls with normal UPJ (Group I), Ureteropelvic junction obtruction (UPJO) with crossing vessel (Group II) and UPJ obstruction without crossing vessel (Group III). Groups were also compared in terms of the presence of fibrosis and inflammation.
resultsThe mean age of total population included in the study was 30.5±18.5 years. No significant differences were detected between the three groups regarding mean and median numbers of ICs at the level of UPJ (lamina propria and muscle layer) and mean and median numbers of neurons at the level of lamina propria (p>0.05). Likewise, no significant differences were detected between the three groups regarding the presence of fibrosis and inflammation (p>0.05).
conclusionNumber of ICs, neurons, presence of fibrosis and inflammation seem to be similar in the intact UPJ and UPJ with obstruction with and without crossing vessel. Cellular function rather than the number ICs might play a role that warrants further research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.