Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201020›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2018

Mutational signature distribution varies with DNA replication timing and strand asymmetry.

Marketa Tomkova, Jakub Tomek, Skirmantas Kriaucionis, Benjamin Schuster-Böckler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Topographical archetypes of somatic mutagenesis in cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Clinicopathological and genomic features of extrachromosomal DNA in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Intergenerational Enlargement of Human Organs as a Driver of Increased Cancer Risk?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marketa TomkovaLudwig Cancer Research Oxford, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Jakub TomekDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK.
Skirmantas KriaucionisLudwig Cancer Research Oxford, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Benjamin Schuster-BöcklerLudwig Cancer Research Oxford, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK. benjamin.schuster-boeckler@ludwig.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8892-5133

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (GB) BB/M001873/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/F500394/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GB) EP/F500394/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA replication plays an important role in mutagenesis, yet little is known about how it interacts with other mutagenic processes. Here, we use somatic mutation signatures-each representing a mutagenic process-derived from 3056 patients spanning 19 cancer types to quantify the strand asymmetry of mutational signatures around replication origins and between early and late replicating regions.

resultsWe observe that most of the detected mutational signatures are significantly correlated with the timing or direction of DNA replication. The properties of these associations are distinct for different signatures and shed new light on several mutagenic processes. For example, our results suggest that oxidative damage to the nucleotide pool substantially contributes to the mutational landscape of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

conclusionsTogether, our results indicate an interaction between DNA replication, the associated damage repair, and most mutagenic processes.

Indexed as

DNA Replication TimingMutagenesisDNA RepairEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansMutagensMutationNeoplasmsMutagensDNA repairDNA replicationMutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID30201020
PMCPMC6130095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.